Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 0:06:38 GMT -6
Despite the many advantages that come with the instrumentalization of new technologies, they have also brought about an unquestionable fact that requires attention: the emergence of what is called AI is increasingly opening a digital divide , especially with respect to citizenship in its relationship with the Administration and access to Justice.
The equipment in information and communication technologies in homes, as well as the use of computers, the Internet and electronic commerce, greatly conditions people's daily DJ USA lives, in the workplace, in education centers and in the homes. In the information provided by the National Institute of Statistics , special reference is made to the fact that although it is true that the use of ICT in homes has grown in recent years, there continues to be a gap between users and non-users (digital divide). ) which is attributed to a number of factors: lack of digital infrastructure or connectivity (particularly in rural areas); the lack of computer knowledge and skills necessary to participate in the information society; or the lack of interest in what the information society can offer.
In the field of Justice, Administrations are obliged to facilitate the means to guarantee access to Justice for vulnerable people, who are those who statistically have the least digital skills. An obligation of the legislator and of all those responsible for Justice is to enable the necessary means to overcome this abyss between citizenship and technology, that is, the digital divide. In light of this point, in the monograph From Justice to Cyberjustice , (Editorial Atelier, 2022), Professor of Procedural Law Vicente Perez Daudi analyzes access to justice and the digital divide (pp. 56 to 58), proposing , among other alternatives, that the digital fracture can be overcome through the Bar Associations or Attorneys (ap. 3.3.1 in fine -pg. 58).
In my opinion, the Legal Profession and the Attorney General's Office, also in the procedural field, must play an essential role in channeling the rights of citizens and reducing this digital divide and thus contributing to achieving one of the objectives of the 2030 Agenda, the SDG. 16: peace, justice and strong institutions. The Bar Associations, the CGAE and the Autonomous Councils of the Bar must contribute to reducing this digital divide and work for an essential transition of the Bar to “cyberjustice” .
The equipment in information and communication technologies in homes, as well as the use of computers, the Internet and electronic commerce, greatly conditions people's daily DJ USA lives, in the workplace, in education centers and in the homes. In the information provided by the National Institute of Statistics , special reference is made to the fact that although it is true that the use of ICT in homes has grown in recent years, there continues to be a gap between users and non-users (digital divide). ) which is attributed to a number of factors: lack of digital infrastructure or connectivity (particularly in rural areas); the lack of computer knowledge and skills necessary to participate in the information society; or the lack of interest in what the information society can offer.
In the field of Justice, Administrations are obliged to facilitate the means to guarantee access to Justice for vulnerable people, who are those who statistically have the least digital skills. An obligation of the legislator and of all those responsible for Justice is to enable the necessary means to overcome this abyss between citizenship and technology, that is, the digital divide. In light of this point, in the monograph From Justice to Cyberjustice , (Editorial Atelier, 2022), Professor of Procedural Law Vicente Perez Daudi analyzes access to justice and the digital divide (pp. 56 to 58), proposing , among other alternatives, that the digital fracture can be overcome through the Bar Associations or Attorneys (ap. 3.3.1 in fine -pg. 58).
In my opinion, the Legal Profession and the Attorney General's Office, also in the procedural field, must play an essential role in channeling the rights of citizens and reducing this digital divide and thus contributing to achieving one of the objectives of the 2030 Agenda, the SDG. 16: peace, justice and strong institutions. The Bar Associations, the CGAE and the Autonomous Councils of the Bar must contribute to reducing this digital divide and work for an essential transition of the Bar to “cyberjustice” .