Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 3:45:45 GMT -6
Human mind. Wasting distributed knowledge is an irreparable error. How else can we create the new historical subject that is sought? This factor is critical for the union movement, which has always sought to attract and form a relevant force in society. However, organizations that are born in demand of freedom, justice and equality, many of them become very hierarchical command structures. It can be, in many cases, the final result of the dialectic that historically has inevitably led to the bureaucratization of structures and the imposition of the domination of oligarchies and power apparatuses, the cause and origin of the corruption of the initial revolutionary impulses. of the organizations. This is what is called bureaucratization, the dominance of oligarchies and power apparatuses.
These observations we return to the first point. The answer to the question of how to “strengthen the union” can lead us to strengthening the organization to the detriment of union action. A union action that requires resources and aid from the State to cover the expenses incurred by unions in collective bargaining and in State institutions. We must remember that unions defend all workers, not just their members. The final Australia Phone Number objective - union action with attractive solutions for workers and for society as a whole - is not to strengthen the means or even the organization... Therefore, there is a risk that the survival and strengthening of the organization ends up placing itself above the defense of the workers themselves. Have you read this? Notes for a debate: Unionism for tomorrow, from today and yesterday In conclusion, the last two union congresses held (CCOO and UGT) have once again provided alternatives and solutions that will have to be analyzed in depth.
However, they have generated very little enthusiasm among the workers and their resolutions do not show the way to completely balance the excessive dominance of capital over labor. The reason is very simple: the congressional reflections have revolved, above all, around strengthening the organizational structure and, furthermore, in the debates the packaging and media impact have had a greater role than the content. To this we must add the following: transversal issues have taken precedence over the concept of class that has presided over the long history of the labor movement. Finally, various questions remain in the air: is the rebirth and empowerment of union organizations possible? Will unions be able to organize effectively at the international level to respond to a global and exacerbated capitalism? Will new utopian leaders emerge to contribute powerful ideas, or will the bureaucracy of the system prevail? Answering positively to these questions would greatly help unions regain prominence in the dissemination and application of progressive ideas, in the consolidation of the social welfare State and in social and citizen mobilization.
These observations we return to the first point. The answer to the question of how to “strengthen the union” can lead us to strengthening the organization to the detriment of union action. A union action that requires resources and aid from the State to cover the expenses incurred by unions in collective bargaining and in State institutions. We must remember that unions defend all workers, not just their members. The final Australia Phone Number objective - union action with attractive solutions for workers and for society as a whole - is not to strengthen the means or even the organization... Therefore, there is a risk that the survival and strengthening of the organization ends up placing itself above the defense of the workers themselves. Have you read this? Notes for a debate: Unionism for tomorrow, from today and yesterday In conclusion, the last two union congresses held (CCOO and UGT) have once again provided alternatives and solutions that will have to be analyzed in depth.
However, they have generated very little enthusiasm among the workers and their resolutions do not show the way to completely balance the excessive dominance of capital over labor. The reason is very simple: the congressional reflections have revolved, above all, around strengthening the organizational structure and, furthermore, in the debates the packaging and media impact have had a greater role than the content. To this we must add the following: transversal issues have taken precedence over the concept of class that has presided over the long history of the labor movement. Finally, various questions remain in the air: is the rebirth and empowerment of union organizations possible? Will unions be able to organize effectively at the international level to respond to a global and exacerbated capitalism? Will new utopian leaders emerge to contribute powerful ideas, or will the bureaucracy of the system prevail? Answering positively to these questions would greatly help unions regain prominence in the dissemination and application of progressive ideas, in the consolidation of the social welfare State and in social and citizen mobilization.